By Nicolas Bonnal
AP photo
In 1945, Himmler had written a famous
letter (at least famous in France) to general de Gaulle in order to
recommend him an alliance between France and Germany to save Europe from
the Soviet Union: the defeat of Nazi Europe was such a mess... and
today, France being the shadow of herself, Germany is running again the
continent and Angela Merkel is reigning on her own with the bankers who
created the euro and design a continental austerity and the great
replacement of our peoples. Hitler projects were obsessed too by such
displacements of peoples, by autobahns and by a destruction of our
landscapes and national and Christian roots. Now Brussels's Europe
serves basically the same purpose.
Twenty years ago, my friend John
Laughland had described in his book "The Tainted Source" the
undemocratic origins of European construction. While Europe unwillingly
submits herself to the yoke of not so invisible banks, elites and
agencies, it seems important to recall that the first designer and
builder of that modern Europe was Hitler, for he dreamt of a unified and
Russophobe continent driven by an iron fist and a somewhat erratic
agenda. It is well-known that after the war ex-SS prince Bernhard
created the Bilderbergs with Jesuit Rettinger and NATO agents in order
to fulfil the European construction and the destruction of our nations.
The purpose of the European Construction was to crush Marxist
temptations, to submit our peoples to undemocratic agencies, to isolate
the soviet bloc and to create a pure materialistic world: the world of
the reign of quantity, to put it in René Guénon's words.
Reading the various books written about
the fuehrer and his grandiose projects by world-famous historian David
Irving, I find the following phrases (we are in 1936):
AT this
Nuremberg rally Hitler announced a four-year plan for Germany. His grand
plans on foreign policy came as no surprise Goebbels. After sitting in
on one conference aboard Hitler's yacht Grille at Kiel in May 1936 he had noted down Hitler's prophetic vision of a United States of Europe under a German leadership.
In 1941 Hitler pronounces a speech in Berlin about Europe. Notes Irving:
In his speech he outlined his
unifying role in Europe - how Italy, Hungary, the Nordic countries, and
then Japan had come closer to Germany.
Berlin is again the capital of Europe.
During the war declared by Britain (Hitler just wanted a clean sweep in
the East), the German dictator argues for a destruction of the nations
and their colonies:
As for Europe: there is no
justification for the existence of small nations, and they particularly
have no right to big colonial possessions. In the age of air forces and
armoured divisions small nations are lost.
Hitler was driven by a mad racism
against Slavic peoples. He wanted to colonize the East and send Nordic
colons from all northern Europe in Ukraine or Crimea; the program was
both economical and demographical. A good British, Irving notes with
scepticism the German dreams:
By mid-October, despite the foul
weather, Hitler was still red with optimism. On the thirteenth he began
laying the foundations for a Nazi version of a united Europe. Hewel
wrote, 'Reich foreign minister visits the Fuehrer; first thoughts on a
European manifesto, probably in the economic sphere first of all, and
probably at the beginning of the winter.
While invading Russia, Hitler is
surrounded too by economists and experts and he dreams of a new Europe
no more based on obsolete notions:
Fuehrer is in very best and
relaxed mood.' Over dinner he revealed that he had been thinking of
calling together the economic experts of Denmark, Norway, Holland,
Belgium, Sweden, and Finland. 'All those who have a feeling for Europe can join in this work,' he said, meaning the colonisation of the east.
The fact is that the Nordic peoples
moved but to the South (nobody ever wanted to freeze in the East!),
accelerating the decay of southern European economies. In a few years
the euro has anyway destroyed their economies. The history of Nazi
currency has been well studied by Milton Friedman (a frank admirer of Dr
Schacht's wizardries) and his school. German-European currency is just
an extension of the domain of the fight.
Nobody felt at this gloomy times more European than Himmler and the SS:
It was Himmler who was most
assiduously propagating the new 'European' spirit: in the SS panzer
division 'Viking,' now fighting in the Caucasus, the young men of
Scandinavia and the Netherlands were united with the finest German
troops.
Here we come closer to the present
situation. By the end of the war, as the strength of the Red Army begins
to crush the idealistic and somewhat multicultural Nazi hordes, Hitler -
an insatiable optimist like all the good Europeans - underlines the
necessity of a unified Europe.
'But the British have got it all
quite wrong! They declared war to preserve the "balance of power" in
Europe. But now Russia has awakened and turned into a state of the
highest technical and material calibre. . . This means that the
onslaught from the east can in the future only be met by a united Europe
under German leadership. That is in Britain's interest too.'
A united Europe under German leadership!
Here we are! This doesn't mean that the fuehrer did not betray too the
interests of his race: after all, he was responsible fort he blood and
death of millions of Europeans in the name of a racist and lunatic
agenda; after all he wanted the Japanese to attack Russia in the East
and he awoke the Asian resistance against the British imperial
interests. The fuehrer too was an antiracist who fought his own race.
This is why I call his attitude erratic; as we consider today's European
construction absurd, prejudicial and doomed.
Of course I am exaggerating! The goals
are the same but not the means. So let us call Hitler - after Napoleon -
the enfant terrible of European Construction; and read again Tolstoy's
War and Peace to understand the confuse mind of westerners...
By David Irving: Hitler's war; Goebbels, the mastermind of the Third Reich
Nicolas Bonnal
No comments:
Post a Comment