ISREAL Lobby group wants war on SYRIA.

It did so formally. It didn't surprise. It has more than Syria in mind. A
previous article explained.
The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations
wants war. AIPAC is its best known member.
It's a blight on humanity. It's an unregistered foreign agent. It
operates illegally. It does so destructively.
It promotes war. It deplores peace. It supports the worst of Israeli
crimes. It supports its most unprincipled interests.
It controls US administrations and Congress. Edward Said called it
"the most powerful and feared lobby in Washington."
In a matter of hours, he said, it can mobilize unanimous Senate
support for Israel. Political Washington bows to its will. It does so
disgracefully. It does it destructively.
It's doing it now. In days, Congress will rubber-stamp Obama's
intended lawless aggression on Syria. He plans mass killing and
destruction.
AIPAC endorses it. On September 3, it headlined "Press Statement on
Syrian Resolution," saying:
"AIPAC urges Congress to grant the President the authority he has
requested to protect America’s national security interests and
dissuade the Syrian regime's further use of unconventional weapons."
"The civilized world cannot tolerate the use of these barbaric weapons,
particularly against an innocent civilian population including
hundreds of children."
"Simply put, barbarism on a mass scale must not be given a free
pass."
"This is a critical moment when America must also send a forceful
message of resolve to Iran and Hezbollah - both of whom have
provided direct and extensive military support to Assad."
"The Syrian regime and its Iranian ally have repeatedly demonstrated
that they will not respect civilized norms."
"That is why America must act, and why we must prevent further
proliferation of unconventional weapons in this region."
"America's allies and adversaries are closely watching the outcome of
this momentous vote. This critical decision comes at a time when Iran
is racing toward obtaining nuclear capability."
"Failure to approve this resolution would weaken our country's
credibility to prevent the use and proliferation of unconventional
weapons and thereby greatly endanger our country’s security and
interests and those of our regional allies."
"AIPAC maintains that it is imperative to adopt the resolution to
authorize the use of force, and take a firm stand that the world’s
most dangerous regimes cannot obtain and use the most dangerous
weapons."
AIPAC's one of 51 US Zionist organizations. The Conference of
Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (CPMAJO)
represents them.
AIPAC's best known. Both organizations work cooperatively. CPMAJO
largely focuses on US administrations. AIPAC mostly lobbies
Congress.
They seek unequivocal support for Israel. They're in lockstep for war
on Syria. On September 3, the CPMAJO said :
"The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations
said today that the use of chemical weapons violates fundamental
international norms and principles."
"The use of such indiscriminate weapons of mass destruction
represents moral challenges that require a strong response. It also
poses vital national security concerns to the US and to our interests
and to those of our allies in the region."
"Those who perpetuate such acts of wanton murder must know that
they cannot do so with impunity. Those who possess or seek weapons
of mass destruction, particularly Iran and Hezbollah, must see that
there is accountability."
"Failing to take action would damage the credibility of the US and
negatively impact the effort to prevent Iran from achieving a nuclear
weapons capacity."
"We hope there will be a national consensus that will send a strong
bipartisan message to our friends and foes alike of America's
determination to prevent the proliferation and use of weapons of mass
destruction."
AIPAC and other Conference members want war. They want Syria
ravaged and destroyed. They want regime change. They want pro-
Western puppet governance replacing sovereign Syrian independence.
They want Iran isolated. It bears repeating. The road to Tehran runs
through Damascus. They want Iranian sovereignty destroyed. They
back Israeli war plans. Washington has it own.
They were readied years ago. They could be implemented any time.
Obama may do so on his watch. Full-scale war on Syria risks
embroiling the entire region.
Attacking Iran is imperial madness. WW III might follow. Obama's fool
enough to risk it. He's in lockstep with Israel's imperial ambitions.
Both countries are out-of-control rogue states. They menace
humanity. They do it mindless of what's risked.
On September 3, Stars and Stripes headlined "John Kerry leads charge
for military action against Syria," saying:
He, "Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff Martin Dempsey pressed for US military action against Syria."
They sold war for "three and a half hours." They did so based on lies.
They pressured Senate Foreign Committee members to go along.
"Kerry dominated the hearing." It was his fourth Colin Powell moment.
He repeated previously stated Big Lies.
"(T)he world is watching," he said. It awaits America's decision. Will
it "speak with one voice?" Will it "rise to this moment and make a
difference?"
We're "here because (Assad) unleashed an outrageous chemical
attack against (his) own citizens."
"We're here because a dictator and his family's personal enterprise, in
their lust to hold onto power, were willing to infect the air of
Damascus with a poison that killed innocent mothers and fathers and
hundreds of their children, their lives all snuffed out by gas in the
early morning August 21."
Kerry's a serial liar. So-called evidence he cited is fabricated. It
doesn't matter. Obama's "policy is that Assad must go."
"(W)e have other (regional) strategic national security interests," he
said. He means Iran's next after destroying Syria.
He lied saying "Obama is not asking America to go to war." He's used
proxy death squads for two and half years.
He intends greater escalation. He intends shock and awe attacks. He
intends lawless aggression. He intends full-scale war.
He didn't initiate war to end it short of mission accomplished. Kerry
didn't explain. Nor did Hagel or Joint Chiefs chairman Dempsey.
Russian President Vladimir Putin strongly opposes war. He called
evidence that Syria used chemical weapons "absolute nonsense."
"I've already said I find it absolutely ridiculous that (Syrian])
government's armed forces, which today are actually on an offense
mission and in some regions have already encircled the so-called
rebels and are finishing them off, that the Syrian army has used
prohibited chemical weapons," he said.
"They know all too well that this could become a cause for sanctions
and even for a military operation against them. That's stupid and
illogical."
"We proceed from the assumption that if anyone has information that
chemical weapons were used by the Syrian regular army, then such
proof must be presented to the UN Security Council and the UN
inspectors."
Proof must be independently verifiable. It must be "convincing." It
must exclude "rumor" and unsubstantiated intercepted
communications and other fake intelligence.
"Even in the US there are experts who question the reliability of the
facts presented by the administration." They do so for good reason.
Obama officials lied many times before. His war on Libya was based
on lies.
Bush officials did so against Afghanistan and Iraq. All wars are based
on lies.
"All other reasons and means that excuse using military force against
an independent sovereign state are unacceptable and cannot be
classified otherwise but as an aggression, Putin stressed.
"We would be convinced by a detailed investigation and direct
evidence of who exactly used chemical weapons and what substances
were used."
"Then we'll be ready to take decisive and serious action," he said.
Congress intends authorizing lawless aggression. Wall Street Journal
editors wholeheartedly approve. On September 3, they headlined
"Water's Edge Republicans," saying:
"On Syria, (Speaker) Boehner and (House Majority Leader) Cantor r
(ose) above partisanship." They "announced their backing" for
Obama's war.
Doing so provided cover for backbenchers. Both parties are in
lockstep on war. Journal editors give Republican House and Senate
leaders most credit.
They questioned Obama's "overall credibility as Commander in Chief."
Perhaps they want him to incinerate Syria to prove it. For sure they
want full-scale war.
They're mindless of the potentially devastating consequences.
Imperial priorities alone matter.